We verifiëren geen specifieke claims omdat reviewers hun eigen mening mogen geven. We kunnen reviews echter wel als 'Geverifieerd' bestempelen als we bevestiging hebben dat er een zakelijke interactie heeft plaatsgevonden. Meer informatie

Om de integriteit van het platform te beschermen, wordt elke review op ons platform – al dan niet geverifieerd – gescreend door onze geautomatiseerde software. Deze software kan inhoud identificeren en verwijderen die in strijd is met onze richtlijnen, inclusief reviews die niet zijn gebaseerd op een echte ervaring. We zijn ons ervan bewust dat we weleens wat over het hoofd zien, dus je kunt altijd reviews rapporteren waarvan je denkt dat we ze hebben gemist Meer informatie

2,2

Slecht

TrustScore 2 uit 5

12 reviews

5 sterren
4 sterren
3 sterren
2 sterren
1 ster

Geen recente geschiedenis van het vragen naar reviews

Dit bedrijf heeft hun klanten niet recentelijk uitgenodigd, dus reviews zijn mogelijk niet representatief

Heeft nog niet op negatieve reviews gereageerd

Zo gebruikt dit bedrijf Trustpilot

Ontdek hoe ze hun reviews verzamelen, beoordelen en modereren.

2,2

Alle reviews

(12)

12 reviews in de afgelopen 12 maanden

Een review schrijven

Wij controleren reviews

Bedrijven op Trustpilot mogen geen beloningen aanbieden of betalen om reviews te verbergen. Reviews zijn de meningen van individuele gebruikers en niet van Trustpilot. Meer informatie

Beoordeeld met 1 van de 5 sterren

The most frustrating part about the…

The most frustrating part about the instant $2,000 account is the combination of restrictions on the first withdrawal. Not only is your first payout hard-capped at a tiny $50, but that payout is still strictly subject to the 20% consistency rule. This means you cannot make more than $10 in a single day toward that $50 payout cap. You essentially have to distribute tiny, micro-gains across at least 5 different trading days just to be eligible to withdraw $50. It feels less like real prop trading and more like an endless rule maze designed to prevent traders from getting paid. AVOID, Avoid!

12 augustus 2026
Review zonder uitnodiging
Beoordeeld met 1 van de 5 sterren

Avoid Upcomers! Pure scam firm that denies payouts by inventing ridiculous "rules"

Unfair payout denial and absurd rule enforcement – Avoid Upcomers
Do NOT waste your time or money with Upcomers.
I hit all my targets, made over $3,000 in a single week, and requested a modest $1,000 payout. Instead of processing the withdrawal, they denied it and reset my account, effectively wiping out the profits I had worked for.
Here is how my trading was classified during their Risk Review:
Flagging delayed Stop-Loss placement: They flagged 34 positions because the Stop Loss was added a few seconds after opening a market order. When executing a market order dynamically, placing an SL immediately after entry is standard practice. Treating this as “trading without a protective level” is an extremely strict interpretation of risk management.
Scaling into a zone = “Martingale”: Re-entering or adding to a position at a better level within a pre-planned supply/demand zone, with controlled position sizing, was classified as Martingale.
Closing at quick Break-Even = “Tick Scalping”: Some quick BE/SL exits were classified as tick scalping.
Adjusting Stop-Loss = “Moving SL to a worse level”: Dynamic SL management was also used against me. Moving SL to BE or adjusting it during an active trade was included in their risk assessment.
The problem is not that they have risk-management rules. The problem is how broadly these rules were interpreted after the profitable trading had already taken place.
Standard position and risk management — including managing SL, adding to a planned zone, and taking quick BE exits — can apparently be interpreted as prohibited trading practices.
To make matters worse, they did not close my account. Instead, they reset it to the initial balance and allowed me to continue trading, but with future payouts restricted to 50%.
So my first payout was denied, my accumulated profit was removed, and I was told to continue trading under these restrictions.
This is not a trading environment I would recommend to serious traders. Save your time and capital and stay away from Upcomers.

EDIT: They're lying in their response. There won't be a second account review because they just deleted my account because I REFUSED A $100 bribe to delete my comment on Trustpilot. I have screenshots of everything. They're scammers, please don't get caught like I did. They also clearly stated in numerous emails that the decision to deny payment is final and irrevocable, so their response here is ANOTHER LIE.

EDIT2: the bribe has increased to $300, but in order to give it to me, I have to sign an agreement in which I agree to remove all negative comments about this company, so in reality, the only thing they want to achieve is to shut me up. Imagine how many people had to agree to this amount just to not repeat the truth about them.

I really beg you, please take care of yourselves and avoid this company like the plague.

11 augustus 2026
Review zonder uitnodiging
Beoordeeld met 1 van de 5 sterren

SCAM SCAM SCAM

SCAM SCAM SCAM , DID 2.8k profit and they first restricterd me to withdraw only 1k . Then they dropped my profit split at 50% saying i was trading with x,y,z stupid thing that are not acording to their rules and finally from those 495$ left for withdraw when i tried to get them through crypto there`s a 30% FEE due to their lack of whatever crypto bullshit whatever . DO NOT BUY FROM THEM JUST BECAUSE IS CHEAP

10 augustus 2026
Review zonder uitnodiging
Beoordeeld met 1 van de 5 sterren

⭐ 1 Star



⭐ 1 Star – Extremely Disappointed with Upcomers

I am extremely disappointed with my experience with Upcomers.

My funded account was closed for an alleged Daily Loss Limit violation. However, after reviewing my trading history and account records carefully, I could not find any breach of the Daily Loss Limit.

I contacted Upcomers to clarify the situation, but I was not satisfied with the explanation or the way my case was handled. I expected them to provide a clear calculation or proper evidence showing exactly how and when the Daily Loss Limit was breached.

I believe traders deserve transparency, consistency, and fair treatment, especially when an account is being closed for a serious rule violation.

Unfortunately, my experience with Upcomers has been very disappointing, and I am not satisfied with their service or the way this situation was handled.

1000479015.jpg
1000479021.jpg
1000479014.jpg

dashboard par $25,020.44 open equity, $25,047.55 high equity, $24,415.44 low/close equity aur Max Drawdown $670.77 (0.03% of p

My funded account was closed by Upcomers for an alleged Daily Loss Limit violation. However, after reviewing my trading history and the account statistics available on my dashboard, I could not find evidence that I had breached the Daily Loss Limit.

I have screenshots of my account dashboard and trading statistics showing the account performance and drawdown figures. I contacted Upcomers to understand exactly how they calculated the alleged violation and requested a clear explanation, but I was not satisfied with the response or the way my case was handled.

If an account is going to be closed for a serious rule violation, I believe the company should provide clear calculations and transparent evidence showing exactly when and how the limit was breached.

Unfortunately, I did not receive the level of transparency and fair treatment I expected. My account was closed, and I am completely dissatisfied with Upcomers and the way this situation was handled.

I would strongly recommend that traders keep screenshots and detailed records of their account statistics and trades when dealing with prop firms.

Very disappointing experience.
Do not buy this account by mistake just because of its price, as its rules and regulations are completely different.

30 juli 2026
Review zonder uitnodiging
Beoordeeld met 1 van de 5 sterren

They will find a way Not to pay you!

I dont even know why I wasted my time with this company...funny part is...I read all the reviews beforehand...so thats my fault...but I said let me try it out...so I went with 24 hrs challenge account...I think its called the supernova or something...I did the 10k...because I wanted to see if they was legit first...All I had to get was $300 for my profit target...I hit it my target twice...yes I said twice...because the first time I had it...their 50 million rules prevented me to cash out....the catch to the 24 hour challenge is...they want you to trade for 24 hours in the market...so you can breach the account...either way I took about 30+ trades in 24 hours...something I never do...because any true trader knows the longer you stay in the market, quicker you lose your money...If I only got 24 hours, I'm going to look for market structure...find a good entry and execute a hight percentage trade and get out...and I had to do it twice...and after the 24 hours were up, I was well over my profit target...never got paid!

16 juli 2026
Review zonder uitnodiging
Beoordeeld met 1 van de 5 sterren

Scamm propfirm

Scamm propfirm. Just had a vanguard live account and I was 2 days away from payout was in profit, and then they started closing my trades, If I could leave -5 stars I will do it❌❌❌❌

8 juli 2026
Review zonder uitnodiging
Beoordeeld met 1 van de 5 sterren

stay away from the scammers

I have been dealing with this platform for over 6 months. At first, everything seemed normal — their relatively low prices and promotions drew me in. After purchasing no fewer than 55 accounts from them, I never took the time to properly evaluate their performance.
My last purchase was a $100,000 account. The rules were clear: 6% daily loss limit, 10% total loss from the highest balance.
I proceeded with my normal trading — all positions entered at 0.10 lot size on Gold. On 18.6.26, my total stop loss across all open trades was set at $4,800. The account balance was $97,638, meaning the allowed daily drawdown was approximately $5,858 — so there was absolutely no issue.
At 19:45, I was shocked to find that all positions had been closed and the protection mode was activated. When I calculated my total loss, it did not exceed $4,858 — well within the allowed limit of $5,858 for that day.
When I submitted documented proof from their own platform — including all commissions — the total loss was still within the permitted limit and no violation had occurred.
Their response was that their internal system detected a breach — which in fact never happened.
On top of that, there was a clear and significant price slippage on their end.
All evidence will be attached.
My advice: stay away from them like fire.

18 juni 2026
Review zonder uitnodiging
Beoordeeld met 1 van de 5 sterren

Upcomers is terrible. Don't buy it.

WHAT HAVE I EXPERIENCED WITH UPCOMERS?

First time. I reached a payout and my account was placed under review. Eventually, I received allegations regarding my trading style. What stood out to me was that most of the issues raised were not clearly defined in the publicly available rules that traders can easily review before trading. I spent a significant amount of time asking for clarification and explanations. In the end, my payout was denied, 50% of my profits were confiscated, and I accepted that outcome.

Second time. I worked directly with the Brand Reputation team regarding these concerns. After many discussions, I was told that my trading style was acceptable and did not violate any rules. However, when I reached payout again, I was once again accused of violating trading methodology rules. When I asked which specific trades were considered violations and at what times they occurred, I was told that the review was internal and that the details would not be disclosed. The payout calculation looked like this: $2,000 payout → reduced by 50% → reduced again to 25% → withdrawal fees applied. Final amount received: approximately $153. I did in fact receive only $153, and my trading account was terminated. Throughout the discussions, I repeatedly requested several basic principles: if a payout is denied, a specific explanation should be provided; if a trader is considered in violation, the company should identify the trades involved and the rule that was allegedly violated; and reviews should be based on publicly available rules. After many rounds of discussion, these points were finally acknowledged. That led me to ask a simple question: why weren’t these transparency standards in place from the beginning?

Third time. Just when I thought everything had finally been resolved, I adjusted my trading approach, continued trading, and eventually reached another payout stage. This time I received a new accusation: “Multi-accounting.” The explanation given was that two accounts had appeared on the same device and within the same network environment. One of those accounts belonged to my wife. It was registered under her own name, belonged to a different individual, had never received a payout, had stopped trading months before my second payout cycle, had no matching trades whatsoever with my account, did not trade on the same days, and showed no evidence of hedging or coordinated activity. I asked the company to clarify the evidence comparing the trading histories of both accounts and whether there was any direct evidence beyond shared devices or a shared household network.

My concern is not that a company conducts investigations. Investigations are their right. My concern is that traders can be heavily impacted by conclusions while not being provided with sufficient data or evidence to independently assess those conclusions. At times, it feels as though broad internal interpretations can outweigh the written rules available to traders. If I truly violated the rules, why was the issue not raised immediately? Why wait until payout, place the account under review for several days, and only then introduce a new reason to challenge the payout?

I believe many traders could eventually find themselves in a similar situation. This is simply my personal experience. Make your own judgment, do your own research, and read the rules very carefully before deciding to trade with any prop firm. If anyone would like to review the evidence themselves, feel free to contact me privately. I can share the relevant conversations and supporting materials so everyone can draw their own conclusions.

17 juni 2026
Review zonder uitnodiging

Dit is Trustpilot

Iedereen kan een review op Trustpilot achterlaten n.a.v. een ervaring met een bedrijf. Gebruikers hebben het recht om hun feedback op elk moment te wijzigen of te verwijderen, en elke gepubliceerde review is zichtbaar zolang het account van de betreffende gebruiker actief is.

Wij beveiligen ons platform met behulp van toegewijde specialisten en slimme technologieën. Lees meer over hoe wij nepreviews bestrijden.

Lees meer over Trustpilots reviewproces.

Hier vind je 8 tips voor het schrijven van een goede review.

Verificatie helpt ervoor te zorgen dat echte mensen de reviews schrijven die je op Trustpilot ziet staan.

Beloningen aanbieden voor reviews of een slechts een bepaalde groep mensen vragen om een review te schrijven, kan de TrustScore beïnvloeden. Dit is in strijd met onze richtlijnen.

Lees meer