Cyber Trading University
Cyber Trading University
Peter W
1 review
Peter Whorley
Experience 1 – Initial Enrollment:
I was drawn to Cyber Trading University by marketing claims, including references to a “12-time trading champion.” However, independent verification could not be found. Searches for official results from MoneyShow events, the United States Investing Championship (USIC), Robbins World Cup Trading Championships, or other public competitions did not yield any confirmation naming Fausto Pugliese as a repeated winner.
Experience 2 – Continued Interaction / Follow-Up:
Over time, additional concerns became clear. Program costs ranged from $2,000–$15,000+, often with upsells and persistent follow-up communications. Trading room activity lacked transparency, and trades were frequently undocumented. Historical archived reports (TradingSchools.org) show 50+ users reporting similar issues, including opaque results, aggressive upselling, and high costs.
Summary:
While the platform is polished from a marketing perspective, the lack of verified performance, combined with repeated historical complaints, makes it essential to approach with caution. Prospective students should request documented proof of performance and thoroughly research before committing any money and a lot of time .








