A disgusting company, truly Unless your part of their circle, they will spy and manipulate your organisations. They care only for the profit and the agenda they push of the ones they like and will us... Toon meer
We verifiëren geen specifieke claims omdat reviewers hun eigen mening mogen geven. We kunnen reviews echter wel als 'Geverifieerd' bestempelen als we bevestiging hebben dat er een zakelijke interactie heeft plaatsgevonden. Meer informatie
Om de integriteit van het platform te beschermen, wordt elke review op ons platform – al dan niet geverifieerd – gescreend door onze geautomatiseerde software. Deze software kan inhoud identificeren en verwijderen die in strijd is met onze richtlijnen, inclusief reviews die niet zijn gebaseerd op een echte ervaring. We zijn ons ervan bewust dat we weleens wat over het hoofd zien, dus je kunt altijd reviews rapporteren waarvan je denkt dat we ze hebben gemist Meer informatie
Lees wat reviewers zeggen
The website was deceptive! I tried to cancel the day before renewal and it offered me half price, so I agreed to renew. Then I got a notification that they renewed the subscription for 2027, a year in... Toon meer
You get tired of the bashing Trump. Quit your opinion and report financial news, how can you even talk trash about Trump every day when we just left Bidens economy!!! You mean to tell me you "economis... Toon meer
The worst customer service of any company! The systems are useless and not fit for purpose, utterly archaic and overly complex. Zero support would be nice from these lot but the 'support' pr... Toon meer
Bedrijfsgegevens
Informatie afkomstig van verschillende externe bronnen
Bloomberg.com(SM) description on the corporate site: Bloomberg.com is among the the top five most-trafficked financial sites on the Web. It is regarded as a premier site for news and financial information. Bloomberg.com draws from the news and data power of the Bloomberg Professional(R) service and our host of media products to provide the highest quality news and information.
Contactgegevens
Woke channel who instead of doing the…
Woke channel who instead of doing the markets is full of woke bs now what a joke.
Wrong (again).
I have listened to Annmarie Hordern on Bloomberg Surveillance for months saying that the "invest in America" trade is dead. It wasn't.
She's the chief political reporter?
I switched channels....
Horrible company don't work with them
Horrible company don't work with them. Does not care about anything but themselves.
Awful company.
I like the show bloomberg tv only for…
I like the show bloomberg tv only for updates and earnings, but damn they are left leaning. If they were right leaning and truthful about Trump it would be a 5. But they interview people that bash him
A disgusting company
A disgusting company, truly
Unless your part of their circle, they will spy and manipulate your organisations. They care only for the profit and the agenda they push of the ones they like and will use money to destroy the ones they do not. Bloomberg surveillance is a criminal organisation disguised as legal because of the power and influence they have illegally obtained. But what can you do, ay? Write a review on trust pilot hoping someone will do something but no-one ever does. Just another prime example of how money lets you get away with just about anything. BUT God will not... this life is temporary, Bloomberg... hell on the other hand, is forever
Jamila Noel & Rob Salekipour
Interviewed for this company for a TAM role with Jamilla and Rob
I am writing to formally share my feedback regarding my recent interview experience, and to request an apology for aspects of the process that I found unprofessional.
The interview was scheduled for a specific time, yet both of you joined approximately ten minutes late without any acknowledgement or apology. While I understand that meetings can overrun, punctuality is typically expected of candidates. The absence of any recognition of the delay felt discourteous and set an uncomfortable tone from the outset.
During the interview, I was asked whether I had applied directly or had been headhunted — information that would have been available at application stage. This question was revisited in a way that felt unnecessary and unclear in purpose. Additionally, there was significant focus on personal circumstances that did not appear clearly relevant to the role. While I appreciate that interviews should explore motivation and suitability, this line of questioning felt intrusive rather than constructive.
I was also informed in feedback that it was “unprofessional” for me to mention my current company. However, it was referenced multiple times during the interview and I was prompted on that topic. Being criticised for responding to a line of questioning initiated by the interviewers felt inconsistent and unfair.
Furthermore, I was told that I would receive an outcome within two weeks, yet I was informed of the decision within a few hours. While a prompt response is appreciated, this contradicted what was communicated and contributed to an overall sense of disorganisation.
To be clear, this feedback relates specifically to the interview structure and conduct, not the organisation as a whole. I left the process feeling disappointed — not only by the outcome, but by the professionalism of the experience itself.
Given the above, I believe an acknowledgement and apology for the delay and elements of the interview conduct would be appropriate.
I hope this feedback is taken constructively to improve the candidate experience moving forward.
Best regards,
If these guys are running your TAM team, I am surprised you aren't losing candiates - as someone who has worked at large logos all my life (and not stayed in one job like these two clowns)
Website was deceptive re renewal
The website was deceptive! I tried to cancel the day before renewal and it offered me half price, so I agreed to renew. Then I got a notification that they renewed the subscription for 2027, a year in advance, and discovered they had already billed me full price for 2026. The AI help function did not give me a real person to quickly solve this, and a few days later I got an e-mail from a rep who clearly did not understand what had happened and basically just said "Too bad, so sad" in more polite business language.
Evil evil organisation
Evil evil organisation. Their only goal is to trick you into paying for something you want. 0% of their effort is spent building a product you do want. STAY AWAYYYYYY
Awful company
Scumbags on automatic renewal
Scumbags on automatic renewal. They get you for a reasonable monthly fee and then zap your card on renewal, WITHOUT a reminder, for a one time hundreds of dollars, changing your subscription from a monthly to an annual and then customer service flips you an email saying told you so. Basically they nail you for over $700 over 2 years, while losing their clients for life. Nice business model Mike. Point out all the sleaze, grift and corruption in the Trump administration, and then run your company this way? Try sending some investigative reporters to your billing and customer service departments for a week!
Absolutely horrible
Absolutely horrible. Completely biased and fear is all they sell. Somehow for ever day of the last five years we are going into a recession and they are going to save us. Whach those bond yields. SMH!! Everything is a recession indicator. Stay off the news. That’s some of the best advice I can give.
Bloomberg Law has become an…
Bloomberg Law has become an indispensable resource in my practice. The platform combines depth, reliability, and thoughtful design in a way that materially improves day-to-day legal research and workflow.
What stands out most is the quality of customer service and responsiveness. Questions are handled promptly by knowledgeable people who actually understand how lawyers work, rather than by scripts or ticket-closing exercises.
As someone who practiced during the era when legal research was effectively a duopoly, it is refreshing to see a serious alternative that competes on substance, usability, and support. Bloomberg Law has earned its place as a primary research tool.
You cause to much fake news on what If No facts
You cause to much fake news on what could happen
Instead what is happening.Can not believe anything they say anymore.I would never but a subscription
X.com is blocking access
X.com is blocking access, comments or Google (taking for robot, no access to other sites).
Bad programming or other intentions.
Ukraine, peace talks like a Casino Cards Table, Poker is turned to Bridge. Missiles, nukes, but tactics ordinary tools are weak to gain a victory, it is all bluff. Thus, no 100% demands, just a compromise. Otherwise the war will be continuing. Poor soldiers, leaders are cushioned.
Bloomberg’s subscription prices
What are Bloomberg’s subscription prices based on ?
could be way better now
bloomberg is ok but not great. the news is good, but the app and website are glitchy. sometimes hard to find stuff. also, cancelling subscription is a pain. tried to cancel but no response. kinda frustrating. customer service could be better. overall, not bad but not perfect either. might try something else next time.
Reliable source for finance, but takes effort to get used to
I’ve been using Bloomberg for over a year now - mostly to stay updated on market movements, company news, and macroeconomic trends. The platform itself is incredibly informative; you can find everything from stock tickers and real-time charts to deep analytical reports. It’s one of the few places that actually lets you see the "big picture" of what’s happening globally, not just headlines or surface-level summaries.
That said, it’s not the most user-friendly platform. The interface can feel overwhelming at times - especially for those who aren’t professional analysts. There are tons of tabs, widgets, and tools, but navigating through all of them takes patience. Some features are hidden behind layers of menus, and the layout isn’t always intuitive. I sometimes spend more time finding a specific section than reading the actual report.
Another small frustration is how heavy the platform can be - it loads slower than other finance apps, especially on mobile. Notifications also seem inconsistent: sometimes they’re instant, sometimes delayed by hours. Still, I have to give credit where it’s due - Bloomberg’s reliability and depth of information are top-tier. Even with its flaws, I’d rather deal with a clunky interface than risk missing out on accurate market data. It’s not perfect, but for serious users, it’s worth the effort.
Just generally money grabbing
Just generally money grabbing. Relentlessly chasing money from overpriced products. If I could I would move to another platform but they know they have a monopoly
Dit is Trustpilot
Iedereen kan een review op Trustpilot achterlaten n.a.v. een ervaring met een bedrijf. Gebruikers hebben het recht om hun feedback op elk moment te wijzigen of te verwijderen, en elke gepubliceerde review is zichtbaar zolang het account van de betreffende gebruiker actief is.
Bedrijven kunnen reviews verzamelen via geautomatiseerde uitnodigingen. Deze reviews worden als geverifieerd bestempeld, omdat het evident is dat ze op echte ervaringen gebaseerd zijn.
Lees meer over geverifieerde reviews.
Wij beveiligen ons platform met behulp van toegewijde specialisten en slimme technologieën. Lees meer over hoe wij nepreviews bestrijden.
Lees meer over Trustpilots reviewproces.
Hier vind je 8 tips voor het schrijven van een goede review.
Verificatie helpt ervoor te zorgen dat echte mensen de reviews schrijven die je op Trustpilot ziet staan.
Beloningen aanbieden voor reviews of een slechts een bepaalde groep mensen vragen om een review te schrijven, kan de TrustScore beïnvloeden. Dit is in strijd met onze richtlijnen.








