We verifiëren geen specifieke claims omdat reviewers hun eigen mening mogen geven. We kunnen reviews echter wel als 'Geverifieerd' bestempelen als we bevestiging hebben dat er een zakelijke interactie heeft plaatsgevonden. Meer informatie

Om de integriteit van het platform te beschermen, wordt elke review op ons platform – al dan niet geverifieerd – gescreend door onze geautomatiseerde software. Deze software kan inhoud identificeren en verwijderen die in strijd is met onze richtlijnen, inclusief reviews die niet zijn gebaseerd op een echte ervaring. We zijn ons ervan bewust dat we weleens wat over het hoofd zien, dus je kunt altijd reviews rapporteren waarvan je denkt dat we ze hebben gemist Meer informatie

3,2

Gemiddeld

TrustScore 3 uit 5

1 review

5 sterren
4 sterren
3 sterren
2 sterren
1 ster

Zo gebruikt dit bedrijf Trustpilot

Ontdek hoe ze hun reviews verzamelen, beoordelen en modereren.

Bedrijven op Trustpilot mogen geen beloningen aanbieden of betalen om reviews te verbergen. Reviews zijn de meningen van individuele gebruikers en niet van Trustpilot. Meer informatie

Beoordeeld met 1 van de 5 sterren

Be WAREY of International Academy of Family Lawyers -iafl . com lawyers!

www .iafl. com is the website for the International Academy of Family Lawyers. It is where I found a scoundrel named Jean-Michel Camus, working in a company called "Legalcy" at www .legalcy - avocats.fr.
It's a French law firm specializing in family law and international family law (Mr. Camus' review and that of Legalcy is coming next).

The iafl does not have any place on their site to file a grievance or to contact anyone representing them. No phone, no email, no chat, no zoom, no skype, nothing. They have no way to leave feedback on their lawyers. They are the only game in town, as far as I was able to find in google, who has a list of international family lawyers.

I can tell you they have at least one completely unethical, lawyer in the person of Jean-Michel Camus, who I mentioned above, who, once I had decided to hire him and he had my retainer, proceeded to bill me for for every minute on the phone and every email we had prior to his being hired. WITHOUT breathing a word to me that I was paying for all of that! He billed me for finding out about his billing and whether we could work together, AND even billed me for ACCEPTING MY PAYMENT without telling me I was being billed! Of course I could neither accept nor decline, because HE NEVER INFORMED ME! Beyond ludicrous. We had no working contract, I had submitted no payment. It was very clear that I had not yet decided to employ him. If I HAD been told UPFRONT that he was going to be billing me for all of our subsequent conversion and emails, I would have hung up the phone immediately, as would any intelligent person. If I had been told I was going to be billed RETROACTIVELY for all of the aforementioned items above, prior to signing the contract and/or prior to paying the retainer, I would also have refused. It would seem I was expected to read his mind.

On the contract I signed with him, I specifically stated as a condition to my hiring Mr. Camus, that I be informed PRIOR to the using up of any retainer, AND debt obligation to a subsequent one... Mr. Camus entirely ignored this. In fact, the amount of his retainer would have already been completely used up prior to my paying it, because of his "creative" (ie, deceptive) billing scheme. Mr. Camus was employed by me for less than 5 full days during which time he made a total of ONE 10-minute phone call (to the other party's lawyer) and sent FOUR emails.

MR. CAMUS PROPOSES TO CHARGE ME MORE THAN 3,000 (THREE THOUSAND) EUROS FOR HIS "WORK."

I've dealt with lawyers before and have never seen such flagrantly unethical behavior. I am shocked that the iafl would endorse such a lawyer. Maybe they were unaware of it, maybe he hasn't done this before, but he has NOW, and this is the kind of lawyer they are promoting.

Individuals who behave in such a way give lawyers the reputation they have for being snakes and some of the most deceitful and unsavory members of society. Stay FAR away from this site and especially this lawyer, or if you choose to use it (or him, heaven help you!), BEWARE AND TAKE EVERY PRECAUTION. Even though I did, I now have the added hassle of getting the unused portion of my retainer back in addition to the stress of the legal matter that I was already dealing with.

24 november 2020
Review zonder uitnodiging

Is dit jouw bedrijf?

Claim je profiel om toegang te krijgen tot de gratis zakelijke tools van Trustpilot en versterk de relatie met je klanten.

Gratis account aanmaken

Dit is Trustpilot

Iedereen kan een review op Trustpilot achterlaten n.a.v. een ervaring met een bedrijf. Gebruikers hebben het recht om hun feedback op elk moment te wijzigen of te verwijderen, en elke gepubliceerde review is zichtbaar zolang het account van de betreffende gebruiker actief is.

Bedrijven kunnen reviews verzamelen via geautomatiseerde uitnodigingen. Deze reviews worden als geverifieerd bestempeld, omdat het evident is dat ze op echte ervaringen gebaseerd zijn.

Lees meer over geverifieerde reviews.

Wij beveiligen ons platform met behulp van toegewijde specialisten en slimme technologieën. Lees meer over hoe wij nepreviews bestrijden.

Lees meer over Trustpilots reviewproces.

Hier vind je 8 tips voor het schrijven van een goede review.

Verificatie helpt ervoor te zorgen dat echte mensen de reviews schrijven die je op Trustpilot ziet staan.

Beloningen aanbieden voor reviews of een slechts een bepaalde groep mensen vragen om een review te schrijven, kan de TrustScore beïnvloeden. Dit is in strijd met onze richtlijnen.

Lees meer