Cambridge Proofreading Reviews 3.297

TrustScore 5 uit 5

4,9

We verifiëren geen specifieke claims omdat reviewers hun eigen mening mogen geven. We kunnen reviews echter wel als 'Geverifieerd' bestempelen als we bevestiging hebben dat er een zakelijke interactie heeft plaatsgevonden. Meer informatie

Om de integriteit van het platform te beschermen, wordt elke review op ons platform – al dan niet geverifieerd – gescreend door onze geautomatiseerde software. Deze software kan inhoud identificeren en verwijderen die in strijd is met onze richtlijnen, inclusief reviews die niet zijn gebaseerd op een echte ervaring. We zijn ons ervan bewust dat we weleens wat over het hoofd zien, dus je kunt altijd reviews rapporteren waarvan je denkt dat we ze hebben gemist Meer informatie

Lees wat reviewers zeggen

Beoordeeld met 5 van de 5 sterren

They did an excellent job editing my dissertation reference page. The time and stress they saved me are insurmountable. I appreciated that there were two downloads of the edited work available to me.... Toon meer

Beoordeeld met 5 van de 5 sterren

The edits were much deeper than just correcting the English. Also basic suggestions for statistics and gene names. Very thorough and helpful. Excellent Editor! Also the help with getting a new pass... Toon meer

Beoordeeld met 5 van de 5 sterren

Incredible work. I did not expect this degree of thoroughness for the very reasonable price I paid. The editor went above-and-beyond in confirming the formatting of the paper and validity of my citati... Toon meer

Beoordeeld met 5 van de 5 sterren

I found some small grammar mistakes in the document, so I purchased their services to try to catch any final mistakes before the camera-ready deadline. They not only caught plenty of mistakes, but imp... Toon meer

Bedrijfsgegevens

  1. Taalcursusaanbieder

Geschreven door het bedrijf

Cambridge Proofreading are based in Chicago, IL with a global editing team and client base. We proofread and edit UK and US English.


Contactgegevens

4,9

Uitstekend

TrustScore 5 uit 5

3K reviews

5 sterren
4 sterren
3 sterren
2 sterren
1 ster

Heeft nog niet op negatieve reviews gereageerd

Zo gebruikt dit bedrijf Trustpilot

Ontdek hoe ze hun reviews verzamelen, beoordelen en modereren.

Bedrijven op Trustpilot mogen geen beloningen aanbieden of betalen om reviews te verbergen. Reviews zijn de meningen van individuele gebruikers en niet van Trustpilot. Meer informatie

Beoordeeld met 5 van de 5 sterren

Great editors

Great editors
Professionals, timely and precise.
Their comments are great like you are getting a peer-reviewed paper for free.
Thank you 🙏

12 juni 2025
Review zonder uitnodiging
Beoordeeld met 5 van de 5 sterren

Top Quality Edits and Professionalism

I am floored at the quality of work my editor produced. Absolutely phenomenal. I cannot recommend Cambridge Proofreading enough. Reasonably priced compared to other quotes I received. I saved over $1000 and received my edits within 5 days. This company is a lifesaver. Talented, skilled, and professional.

5 juni 2025
Review zonder uitnodiging
Beoordeeld met 2 van de 5 sterren

Great for editing, that’s it.

If you are using them for editing they are great. However, if you are wanting any other of their services, save yourself some time, money, and frustration and use a different service.

29 april 2025
Review zonder uitnodiging
Logo Cambridge Proofreading

Antwoord van Cambridge Proofreading

Dear Garrett,

Thank you again for your honest feedback. We’re truly sorry that this experience didn’t meet expectations.

In this case, we were asked to format a paper to match a journal’s template. As the template lacked detail, our editor referred to the journal’s published author guidelines and noted this approach in the summary report. Unfortunately, several formatting points (such as heading styles and page numbers) were not clearly addressed in either source, which led to your disappointment. While the editor did issue a revised version promptly and clarified decisions made, we understand your concern that clarification should have been sought earlier.

You also raised important concerns about the difference in effort between developmental and language editing. While the service scopes differ—developmental editing focusing on structure and content, and language editing on grammar and clarity—we acknowledge your frustration and appreciate the opportunity to clarify the distinction.

We value your continued trust in our editing services and are grateful for your willingness to help us improve.

Warm regards,
George Wilson

Beoordeeld met 5 van de 5 sterren

As researcher

As researcher, i asked two times for the editing of my research articles during revision. Clearly, the editors did an amazing job with very useful corrections and suggestions. This improves the manuscripts, and makes the stories more comprehensive. So in the future, i will ask again for editing with this company.

25 april 2025
Review zonder uitnodiging
Beoordeeld met 5 van de 5 sterren

Outstanding proofreading service

Outstanding proofreading service. The review (by Pia D. G.) was thorough, professional, and delivered on time. Really impressed with the editor's attention to detail. I find the comments very helpful for my future writing as well. Highly recommend Cambridge Proofreading!

28 april 2025
Review zonder uitnodiging
Beoordeeld met 1 van de 5 sterren

Paid $290 for Unsatisfactory Service

The service is really unsatisfactory as the main changes are changing propositions and quotation marks, but not substantive changes to improve the clarity of the writing. Even worse, the quotation marks shouldn't have been changed as they were latex-specific. If this is what the service Cambridge Proofreading promises to offer, I would not recommend it to others.

24 april 2025
Review zonder uitnodiging
Logo Cambridge Proofreading

Antwoord van Cambridge Proofreading

Dear Jialu,

Thank you for providing feedback on your recent order, and I’m sorry that you were dissatisfied with the work your editor did on your order. Our quality control team carefully reviewed the order and wanted to address some of your comments. The edits made by your editor were not limited to prepositions and quotations marks — where needed, we also improved the register of your writing, substituting more formal language for less academically appropriate expressions. That said, your work did not require extensive intervention, and we do not make changes simply for the sake of it. Instead, when a client’s work is close to publication standard, we tailor our service to make those changes necessary to improve the work while respecting the author’s style. In your case, extensive intervention would have been inappropriate.

I also wanted to address your note regarding the quotation marks. In traditional LaTeX markup, two single quotes (``) were required to produce proper opening quotation marks. However, modern LaTeX packages automatically handle quotation styling, making a quotation mark character (“) correct and preferable for clean, consistent source files. This change does not affect the final typeset output, which I verified by looking at your output file, in which the quotation marks were showing correctly.

Finally, I wanted to note that we offered to revise your file, which you declined due to time constraints. In response, we’re offering a credit against a future order by way of acknowledgement that you weren’t entirely satisfied with your edit. We hope to work with you again in future.

George Wilson
Cambridge Proofreading LLC

Beoordeeld met 5 van de 5 sterren

Exactly what I needed

My regular proofreader couldn't do the job at the last minute. English is not my first language, and I am dyslexic, so the proofread is crucial for me.
It was fast, professional and constructive. Thank you.

24 april 2025
Review zonder uitnodiging
Beoordeeld met 5 van de 5 sterren

Absolutely wonderful

The feedback (from C. Roberts) was absolutely wonderful and all proposed changes made sense and were very helpful. Many adjustments were related to grammar and style, but the editor also helped with reframing in order to stay under the word limit, as well as with the APA style and formatting. I would definitely use this service again and I highly recommend it.

11 april 2025
Review zonder uitnodiging
Beoordeeld met 5 van de 5 sterren

Very good

I especially thank the editor, C. Garcia, for the thorough review and insightful comments. I am very satisfied with the quality of Cambridge Proofreading’s English editing and proofreading services.

11 april 2025
Beoordeeld met 5 van de 5 sterren

Reliable estimates of schedule and great quality of editing for academic content.

I need to have my PhD thesis proof-read and I had looked at other online providers but none could give me an accurate a time-schedule of the work except forr Cambridge proof-reading. I opted for the two-editor service and as a native english speaker I asked them to primarily focus on making sentences shorter and clearer. I was very impressed with the quality of the suggstions made by the two editors and it was very clear that they had sufficient understanding of my subject matter to make meaningful and coherent edits. I will be recommending the company to other researchers I know.

7 april 2025
Review zonder uitnodiging
Beoordeeld met 5 van de 5 sterren

Quality Service

I had a very good experience with Cambridge Proofreading, and I especially thank the editor, C. Singleton, for the thorough review and insightful comments.

I also appreciate George Wilson from the client service team for his excellent communication and prompt responses.

9 april 2025
Review zonder uitnodiging
Beoordeeld met 5 van de 5 sterren

Very satisfied with the service

I’m very satisfied with the service I received from Cambridge Proofreading. The work was thorough, professional, and delivered on time. I especially want to thank the proofreader for the thoughtful and constructive feedback—it was insightful and added real value to my writing. I appreciate the attention to detail and the clarity you brought to the text. I’ll definitely be using your services again and recommending Cambridge Proofreading to others.

30 maart 2025
Review zonder uitnodiging

Dit is Trustpilot

Iedereen kan een review op Trustpilot achterlaten n.a.v. een ervaring met een bedrijf. Gebruikers hebben het recht om hun feedback op elk moment te wijzigen of te verwijderen, en elke gepubliceerde review is zichtbaar zolang het account van de betreffende gebruiker actief is.

Bedrijven kunnen reviews verzamelen via geautomatiseerde uitnodigingen. Deze reviews worden als geverifieerd bestempeld, omdat het evident is dat ze op echte ervaringen gebaseerd zijn.

Lees meer over geverifieerde reviews.

Wij beveiligen ons platform met behulp van toegewijde specialisten en slimme technologieën. Lees meer over hoe wij nepreviews bestrijden.

Lees meer over Trustpilots reviewproces.

Hier vind je 8 tips voor het schrijven van een goede review.

Verificatie helpt ervoor te zorgen dat echte mensen de reviews schrijven die je op Trustpilot ziet staan.

Beloningen aanbieden voor reviews of een slechts een bepaalde groep mensen vragen om een review te schrijven, kan de TrustScore beïnvloeden. Dit is in strijd met onze richtlijnen.

Lees meer