Proof-Reading-Service.com Reviews 2.406

Valuable advice was given, the work was completed faster than the deadline.

fast and amazing quality

High level of Cost/Quality ratio. Respect of deadlines

Delivery in time.
High quality check of language.
Good feedback on the comprehensibility of the content.

Proofreading service is satisfactory, very helpful and makes our paper more communicative, so that it can be quickly accepted in the journal we are aiming for.

The comments in the so-called clean version should be placed in the tracked version. I could not remove these comments with Ctrl+Shift+E.
My mistake?

Very Professional work, easy contact, every what I needed.

An excellent service with an interesting suggestions and opportunities to lead more understandable some sentences.

PRS was ahead of schedule on the agreed upon deadline. The proofs/edits/suggestions were appreciated.

Excellent service which makes sense and corrects grammar on top. Highly recommended for all professionals!

Everything was correct. I will use this web again for sure.

Quick, good communication and efficient.

Good experience,
On-time,
Honest price

The review process is ok. May I suggest to implement the reviwe procees on Google docs?

I thought this retouching was very good and I hope that the later retouching will also be performed by the experts.

Quick and precise service. Price was adequate. We were fully satisfied. We'll use it again.

very easy to contact and upload/send the files, the payment process is also super easy, comments with hints/tips are given, Thank you very much!

Our paper was rejected because of language problems, even though it has been proof-read here.

The original text of the editor is as follows.
Upon initial review, we have found that there were issues with the manuscript that prevent us from sending it out for peer review. For example, these issues typically include spelling and grammar errors, figure resolution, or other formatting issues, etc. We encourage you to address these issues and then resubmit your article in its updated form.

I understand that the paper has been proof-read but the manuscript contains a number of phrases taken from other published papers, most notably in the (Introduction Section), Result Section (subsection 3.1) and Discussion Section (2nd & 3rd paragraph). We recommend these are reworked before peer review. If you resubmit these changes must be mentioned in any new cover letter.