They did an excellent job editing my dissertation reference page. The time and stress they saved me are insurmountable. I appreciated that there were two downloads of the edited work available to me.... Toon meer
We verifiëren geen specifieke claims omdat reviewers hun eigen mening mogen geven. We kunnen reviews echter wel als 'Geverifieerd' bestempelen als we bevestiging hebben dat er een zakelijke interactie heeft plaatsgevonden. Meer informatie
Om de integriteit van het platform te beschermen, wordt elke review op ons platform – al dan niet geverifieerd – gescreend door onze geautomatiseerde software. Deze software kan inhoud identificeren en verwijderen die in strijd is met onze richtlijnen, inclusief reviews die niet zijn gebaseerd op een echte ervaring. We zijn ons ervan bewust dat we weleens wat over het hoofd zien, dus je kunt altijd reviews rapporteren waarvan je denkt dat we ze hebben gemist Meer informatie
Lees wat reviewers zeggen
The edits were much deeper than just correcting the English. Also basic suggestions for statistics and gene names. Very thorough and helpful. Excellent Editor! Also the help with getting a new pass... Toon meer
Incredible work. I did not expect this degree of thoroughness for the very reasonable price I paid. The editor went above-and-beyond in confirming the formatting of the paper and validity of my citati... Toon meer
I found some small grammar mistakes in the document, so I purchased their services to try to catch any final mistakes before the camera-ready deadline. They not only caught plenty of mistakes, but imp... Toon meer
Bedrijfsgegevens
Geschreven door het bedrijf
Cambridge Proofreading are based in Chicago, IL with a global editing team and client base. We proofread and edit UK and US English.
Contactgegevens
Verenigde Staten
- info@cambridgeproofreading.com
- proofreading.org
Heeft nog niet op negatieve reviews gereageerd
Zo gebruikt dit bedrijf Trustpilot
Ontdek hoe ze hun reviews verzamelen, beoordelen en modereren.
Excellent work for a journal article
I recently submitted a manuscript in telecommunications and business strategy for proofreading with Cambridge Proofreading. This was my first experience working with them, and I was thoroughly impressed with the quality of their work. Despite the manuscript's length (13,000 words), the proofreading was meticulous and precisely aligned with the APA style required by my target journal. Additionally, their suggested improvements enhanced the clarity and readability of my writing. The value for money was outstanding as well. Many thanks to Cambridge Proofreading for their excellent service.
A trusted partner for proofreading and editing
I made two orders with Cambridge Proofreading, and their editors helped me revise our manuscripts with very professional and efficient attitude and the reports are very high quality.
Great service
Great service. The editor kept my voice but improved it and made it clearer. He also was able to make comments on how the arguments I was making could be improved - so it wasn’t just about editing my grammar and spelling etc, but also making sure I was expressing my point with clarity. He also got rid of redundancies. He also seems to really read and understand what I was talking about and commented on areas I might have either been contradicting myself or repeating myself or not fully linking into the argument I was supposed to have been making. They are more expensive than other editing companies but worth every penny.
on time, good
I think the proofreader was very helpful, I appreciate the work done
Very thorough
I am grateful for how thorough the edit was in a short timeframe. The edits related to the citations were excellent! I am also pleased with the feedback on the content.
Remakable services
Remakable services in terms of promptness, rush arrived ahead of already short time, responsivess to special requests and quality of editing. Way of sending results is great: one clean copy and one copy with track changes, comments and references to applyied rules.
Incredible service, highly recommend
My proofreader from Cambridge Proofreading did an incredible job. The work was extremely detailed and thorough. The whole thesis reads so much more professionally, accurately and succinctly, helpfull feedback was given where i had missed a reference of repeated a quote. This was a complete overhaul of the work. After the proofreading my supervisors were really happy with the revised thesis and were happy for me to submit it. I am so grateful to my proofreader, the service has helped me immenseley. I will trust them completely in future for proof reading of papers and highly recommend them.
Very good work.
Very good work.
I have used the Cambridge proofreading services various times, and I have always been satisfied. The work has been delivered on time, and besides the corrections, the Editor generally provides suggestions and comments useful to improve the manuscript.
I will refer to the service again in the future. Really useful for not mother tongue researchers.
Great work
Great work! love to learn from this service, Cambridge Proofreading.
Thanks a lot,
Returned the job twice with major issues and kept me waiting three days after the deadline for unkept promises
I have given them two stars because everyone I dealt with was friendly but the way things unfolded were a mess. I contacted Cambridge for a proofreading and formatting job and made sure to email them all relevant documents and instructions pre. the quote, so as to be certain that they could proceed. I was told yes, and that the document would be returned to me by my deadline on Monday. On the Monday it was returned slightly late but still within an acceptable time frame. The proofreader had left very friendly and helpful notes. However, he had not followed any of my instructions. I immediately got in touch with Cambridge to explain this and they said the document would be returned to the proofreader, and then returned to me on Tuesday morning. The document arrived at the end of Tuesday afternoon. The proofreader had written a very pleasant letter of apology, explaining that there had been a miscommunication, leading to him following another set of instructions in error but that he had now followed my instructions. However aside from a number of inconsistencies and oversights in his new proofreading, he had divided the lists in the document into 'tables', that he explained were tricky to work with. He warned me that in the case of such 'tables' Word can make various random breaks in strange places, as had happened now to him. Various pages of my document were now half blank or had several lines of white empty space in unwanted places, and the 16–page document had bloomed into 20 pages due to the redundant spaces. I immediately got in touch with Cambridge to explain that this wasn't viable and to underline that Word must have a solution for lists and tables that doesn't involve creating random page breaks throughout a document. I requested that they pass the document to a formatting specialist to solve the error. Cambridge reverted a few hours later (still without any apology for what had so far transpired, each time just acknowledging with "Received with thanks") and wrote that the formatting on the document produced by the proofreader seemed not to be responding, and that the file he had produced might be corrupted (something I believe was unlikely because the proofreader had himself acknowledged the issue and said that it was the result of him creating 'tables."). Cambridge wrote that their team manager would be working on the file and looking for a fix on the next day, Wednesday and that they would be in touch on Wednesday. By Thursday morning, I had still heard and received nothing from Cambridge so I decided that I would need to start again from scratch elsewhere. I sent an email requesting that Cambridge refund me. They agreed to do so and were friendly once again, and for the first time apologetic. However the crux of the issue is three days after my deadline, I have no document and in the extra 36 hours that Cambridge had from Tuesday to resolve the issue (while keeping me waiting for nothing and without any signal), they could either have fixed the "table" issue created by the proofreader directly or simply returned to my original source document and redone the formatting, from scratch. I find my experience with them to be extremely unprofessional.

Antwoord van Cambridge Proofreading
Consistent and dependable!
Consistent and dependable!! The Cambridge Team is simply the best in the industry-Well done once again!
Excellent work!
It provides a very good service.
Excellent work
Excellent work! Very precise and supportive!!!
The whole team behind Cambridge Proofreading is quick, reliable, nice and friendly. Highly recommended!
These guys are amazing
These guys are amazing. They were professional, thorough and turned around my project before the deadline - giving me great peace of mind. I will certainly be using them again.
Dit is Trustpilot
Iedereen kan een review op Trustpilot achterlaten n.a.v. een ervaring met een bedrijf. Gebruikers hebben het recht om hun feedback op elk moment te wijzigen of te verwijderen, en elke gepubliceerde review is zichtbaar zolang het account van de betreffende gebruiker actief is.
Bedrijven kunnen reviews verzamelen via geautomatiseerde uitnodigingen. Deze reviews worden als geverifieerd bestempeld, omdat het evident is dat ze op echte ervaringen gebaseerd zijn.
Lees meer over geverifieerde reviews.
Wij beveiligen ons platform met behulp van toegewijde specialisten en slimme technologieën. Lees meer over hoe wij nepreviews bestrijden.
Lees meer over Trustpilots reviewproces.
Hier vind je 8 tips voor het schrijven van een goede review.
Verificatie helpt ervoor te zorgen dat echte mensen de reviews schrijven die je op Trustpilot ziet staan.
Beloningen aanbieden voor reviews of een slechts een bepaalde groep mensen vragen om een review te schrijven, kan de TrustScore beïnvloeden. Dit is in strijd met onze richtlijnen.







